Friday, August 19, 2016

GRANGER ASSOCIATES vs. MICROWAVE SYSTEMS, INC.

G.R. No. 79986
September 14, 1990

Foreign Corporation doing business in the Philippines

FACTS:

Granger Associates is a foreign corporation which was organized in the United States and has no license to do business in this country.   Microwave Systems, Inc., is a domestic corporation which has been sued for recovery of a sum equivalent to US$900,633.30 allegedly due from it to the petitioner.

The claim arose from a series of agreements concluded between the two parties, giving MSI the license to manufacture and sell its products in the Philippines and extended to the latter certain loans, equipment and parts.  Payment of these contracts not having been made as agreed upon, Granger filed a complaint against MSI and the other private respondents in the Regional Trial Court.

MSI alleged the affirmative defense that the plaintiff had no capacity to sue, being an unlicensed foreign corporation, and moved to dismiss.

Motion to dismiss was granted by RTC which was affirmed by the CA.

In this petition, Granger seeks the reversal of the respondent court on the ground that MSI has failed to prove its affirmative allegation that Granger was transacting business in the Philippines. It insists that it has dealt only with MSI and not the general public and contends that dealing with the public itself is an indispensable ingredient of transacting business. It also argues that its agreements with MSI covered only one isolated transaction for which it did not have to secure a license to be able to file its complaint.

ISSUE:

Whether or not Granger Associates was doing business in the Philippines?

RULING:

YES.  It can be shown that the parties entered into a series of agreements, as in successive sales of the foreign company's regular products, that company shall be deemed as doing business in the Philippines.

The quoted stipulations show that Granger had extended its personality in the Philippines and would receive orders for its products and discharge its warranty obligations through the agency of MSI It would even appear that Granger intended to transact business in the Philippines through the instrumentality of MSI not only for the sale and warranty of its products in this country.

There is also a showing that the investment of Granger in MSI is quite substantial, enabling it to participate in the actual management and control of MSI In fact, it appointed a representative in the board of directors to protect its interests, and this director was so influential that, at his request, the regular board meeting was converted into an annual stockholder's meeting to take advantage of his presence. 

We are convinced from an examination of the terms and conditions of the contracts and agreements entered into between petitioner and private respondents indicate that they established within our country a continuous business, and not merely one of a temporary character. Such agreements did not constitute only one isolated transaction, as the petitioner contends, but a succession of acts signifying the intent of Granger to extend its operations in the Philippines.


The purpose of the rule requiring foreign corporations to secure a license to do business in the Philippines is to enable us to exercise jurisdiction over them for the regulation of their activities in this country, If a foreign corporation operates in the Philippines without submitting to our laws, it is only just that it not be allowed to invoke them in our courts when it should need them later for its own protection. While foreign investors are always welcome in this land to collaborate with us for our mutual benefit, they must be prepared as an indispensable condition to respect and be bound by Philippine law in proper cases, as in the one at bar.

No comments:

Great Pacific Life vs. CA

  G.R. No. 113899,  October 13, 1999   FACTS: A contract of group life insurance was executed between petitioner Grepalife) and DBP. G...